Your vehicles drive. Your governance doesn't.
Autonomous vehicles execute driving decisions across thousands of road scenarios every second. Regulators require operational design domain enforcement, crash reporting within 5 days, and continuous behavioral monitoring. NHTSA has issued $1.5M+ in civil penalties. 3.2 million vehicles are under active investigation. 100+ robotaxis were immobilized in a single fleet cascade event. The governance gap between what vehicles decide and what compliance covers is a public safety risk.
Self-hosted by design. Bring your own model, bring your own key -- your vehicle telemetry + driving data stays in your infrastructure. Agentomy never proxies, never hosts, never sees the data plane. sovereignty model →
Autonomous vehicles without behavioral governance
A robotaxi dragged a pedestrian 20 feet, resulting in a $1.5M civil penalty and a nationwide operational suspension. A ride-hail test vehicle killed a pedestrian after its perception system cycled through five different object classifications in six seconds -- with emergency braking disabled. 100+ robotaxis froze simultaneously during evening rush hour, blocking intersections for hours and triggering a national permit freeze. A fleet vehicle bypassed a stopped school bus with active signals, leading to a 3,067-vehicle recall.
Every autonomous vehicle platform governs the driving model's outputs: lane keeping, object detection, path planning. No platform governs the fleet's behavior: ODD violations, perception degradation, emergency response failures, cascade events, remote intervention readiness. Agentomy closes that gap.
10 detection patterns mapped to real incidents and real regulations
Every pattern references a documented incident, a specific regulatory requirement, and a concrete detection method. The behavioral monitor includes 9 core methods available in every deployment and 31 vertical-specific methods (including 5 AV-fleet-specific detection methods) with fleet infrastructure. The full 40-method monitor runs continuously across the fleet operations lifecycle. No theoretical threats. No generic compliance language.
5 governance layers for autonomous vehicle fleet operations
Each layer enforces one aspect of fleet governance -- from individual vehicle ODD compliance to fleet-wide emergency halt across all operating regions.
10 frameworks, real enforcement deadlines, real penalties
Every control mapping references the actual regulatory document. No generic compliance language. All mappings are self-assessed, pending external validation. Penalty exposure ranges from NHTSA civil penalties to EUR 35M under the EU AI Act.
| Framework | Status | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA SGO 2021-01 | Active (amended 2023) | Mandatory crash reporting for ADS vehicles. 5-day initial report. Updated report within 10 days. Fleet operators must maintain records for 3+ years. Civil penalties up to $26,315/violation/day. |
| NHTSA AV Framework 4.0 | Active (voluntary) | System safety, ODD definition, OEDR, crashworthiness, post-crash behavior. Voluntary self-assessment but increasingly referenced in enforcement actions. |
| UNECE WP.29 R157 | Active | First binding international regulation for Level 3 automated driving (ALKS). Emergency vehicle detection, minimal risk condition, data storage system (DSSAD). Type approval required. |
| EU AI Act (2024/1689) | Aug 2026 / Aug 2027 | AV AI classified as high-risk under Annex III Section 2(a). Risk management, transparency, human oversight. Penalties up to EUR 35M or 7% global turnover. |
| California DMV AV Regs | Active | Title 13 CCR Article 3.7. ODD compliance monitoring, remote intervention capability, collision reporting within 10 days, disengagement reporting. Most comprehensive US state framework. |
| ISO 26262 | Active | Functional safety for road vehicles. ASIL classification A-D. Hardware and software safety requirements. Hazard analysis and risk assessment. Required for type approval. |
| ISO/PAS 21448 (SOTIF) | Active | Safety of the Intended Functionality. Addresses performance limitations and triggering conditions. Complements ISO 26262 for ADS. Weather, sensor degradation, edge cases. |
| UL 4600 | Active | Safety case framework for autonomous products. Claims, arguments, evidence structure. Sensor validation, operational safety, post-deployment monitoring. Cybersecurity for safety-critical systems. |
| SAE J3016 | Active | Taxonomy defining Levels 0-5 of driving automation. Foundation for all AV regulatory frameworks. DDT allocation, fallback requirements, minimal risk condition definition. |
| FMVSS | Active + proposed | Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. FMVSS 141 (proposed) for ADS-equipped vehicles. FMVSS 131 (school bus safety devices). Existing crashworthiness standards. Defect reporting under 49 USC 30166. |
Fatalities, fleet freezes, $1.5M penalties, and 3.2M vehicles under investigation
Detected by: ODD Violation, Pedestrian Detection Gap, Incident Reporting Delay
Detected by: Perception Degradation, Pedestrian Detection Gap, Emergency Response Failure
Detected by: Fleet Cascade Failure, Remote Intervention Timeout, Weather Adaptation Failure
Detected by: School Zone Violation, Pedestrian Detection Gap, ODD Violation
Detected by: ODD Violation, Perception Degradation, Emergency Response Failure
Detected by: Weather Adaptation Failure, Environmental Adaptation, Fleet Health Monitor
Four entry paths to governed autonomous vehicle fleets
Connect any fleet management platform through the protocol that fits your infrastructure. Gate mode for pre-operation authorization. Observer mode for post-operation monitoring. Both modes produce the same audit trail.
20 autonomous vehicle fleet governance scenarios. Run it yourself.
Suite 9: Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Operations Governance. 20 self-contained, idempotent scenarios across 4 coverage areas: ODD compliance (5), fleet health monitoring (5), SGO reporting compliance (5), and emergency response (5). Every scenario runs against the live governance layer. No mocks. No stubs.
What we are and what we are not
- Pre-revenue. No production autonomous vehicle fleet deployments. Adapters validated through tests and benchmarks, not live fleet operations.
- All compliance mappings are internal self-assessments. No independent audit or third-party certification has been conducted.
- Agentomy is not itself a vehicle safety system. It monitors the behavior of autonomous driving software -- it does not make driving decisions or process sensor data for perception.
- Detection patterns are validated against documented historical incidents, not real-time vehicle telemetry feeds.
- The sub-20ms halt is measured in test environments. Latency in production fleet infrastructure will vary based on network topology and vehicle connectivity.
- AV regulatory landscape is evolving rapidly. FMVSS 141 is proposed, not final. State regulations vary significantly. International harmonization is incomplete.
- GovernanceBench scenarios test the governance layer, not driving model performance. Governance is not a substitute for perception validation or safety case construction.
Three commands to governed autonomous vehicle fleets
Govern your fleet before regulators ground it.
NHTSA SGO enforcement is active. EU AI Act deadlines begin August 2026. UNECE R157 type approval is required for international markets. California DMV permits are revocable. The compliance gap is closing.
Request Access